/home/arranoyd/mail/.spam/cur/1669456881.M899200P2948624.nl53.altushost.com,S=11525,W=11668:2,
Return-Path: <17749-18715-326172-3446-excelsior=energyclinic.com@mail.gobackyard.rest>
Delivered-To: arranoyd+spam@nl53.altushost.com
Received: from nl53.altushost.com
	by nl53.altushost.com with LMTP
	id miClNPHjgWMQ/iwAmQ2V0w
	(envelope-from <17749-18715-326172-3446-excelsior=energyclinic.com@mail.gobackyard.rest>)
	for <arranoyd+spam@nl53.altushost.com>; Sat, 26 Nov 2022 11:01:21 +0100
Return-path: <17749-18715-326172-3446-excelsior=energyclinic.com@mail.gobackyard.rest>
Envelope-to: excelsior@energyclinic.com
Delivery-date: Sat, 26 Nov 2022 11:01:21 +0100
Received: from [104.148.65.58] (port=53138 helo=cdn.gobackyard.rest)
	by nl53.altushost.com with esmtp (Exim 4.95)
	(envelope-from <17749-18715-326172-3446-excelsior=energyclinic.com@mail.gobackyard.rest>)
	id 1oyrzs-00CMu4-8g
	for excelsior@energyclinic.com;
	Sat, 26 Nov 2022 11:01:21 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=k1; d=gobackyard.rest;
 h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Message-ID; i=CustomerSurvey@gobackyard.rest;
 bh=fNeGalqx5eFAgrsmj5RzNiB9+Ps=;
 b=mtO58bi4IAS2O3Z0e5xP6lDJmA0FvHCzxwfBx8RjBsxsmkh/i+eu2PBihSKdFUtj17WlyKujtx0l
   RfvCcmN7UNR599IzVZ0WSTPfaxvyUaYQAfDyzuF4I6plDcaGXm3qiV0DgL+P+jFccZxJJczpA5u/
   QLScFkM9y9y0YEEsgCI=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=k1; d=gobackyard.rest;
 b=NmslEa50of5ofebS5r6g8vwEzGSo+0OGrceyuP9Ag3lYyKtzE+SEWfy/fYVJlO3JhCVh+5iXhboy
   zVSIAeGpGD766DKU8sTjoMOQYgiX7b8slLZrQqgeBrWWXKqzy0XQwp1q8FNP+SMq3w4z6BfNEpvb
   k3uXjVcoKWNUZY4vKhc=;
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="c4df6bcaa02876983236be43c7213533_491b_4fa1c"
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2022 11:00:08 +0100
From: "ShopperDealsDirect" <CustomerSurvey@gobackyard.rest>
Reply-To: "ShopperDealsDirect" <CustomerFeedback@gobackyard.rest>
To: <excelsior@energyclinic.com>
Message-ID: <wkxsas7obx04865j-s3mhzdxvk86jkvtw-491b-4fa1c@gobackyard.rest>
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=7.9
X-Spam-Score: 79
X-Spam-Bar: +++++++
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "nl53.altushost.com",
 has identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original
 message has been attached to this so you can view it or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 root\@localhost for details.
 Content preview:  Leave your feedback and you could WIN! http://gobackyard.rest/nzvdVkKz0b7Q9tuePUTK1APFgvUNRwr9ArBOKWIFsMNBzUST
    http://gobackyard.rest/jQTCBQMmr7_6DT-9YKK5pWtSWV-MJ10bsoQjsPtjjjL--gXw 
 Content analysis details:   (7.9 points, 5.0 required)
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
  0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED          ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was
                             blocked.  See
                             http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
                              for more information.
                             [URIs: gobackyard.rest]
  1.9 URIBL_ABUSE_SURBL      Contains an URL listed in the ABUSE SURBL
                             blocklist
                             [URIs: gobackyard.rest]
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  0.0 PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT BODY: MIME text/plain claims to be ASCII
                              but isn't
  0.0 HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST BODY: HTML font color similar or
                             identical to background
  0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF          Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
                             envelope-from domain
  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
                             valid
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU          Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
                             author's domain
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID             Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
  1.7 RAZOR2_CHECK           Listed in Razor2 (http://razor.sf.net/)
  2.4 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 Razor2 gives confidence level above 50%
                             [cf: 100]
  2.0 RDNS_NONE              Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
  0.0 FSL_BULK_SIG           Bulk signature with no Unsubscribe
X-Spam-Flag: YES
Subject:  ***SPAM***  Leave your feedback and you could WIN!
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, forwarded message

--c4df6bcaa02876983236be43c7213533_491b_4fa1c
Content-Type: text/plain;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Leave your feedback and you could WIN!

http://gobackyard.rest/nzvdVkKz0b7Q9tuePUTK1APFgvUNRwr9ArBOKWIFsMNBzUST

http://gobackyard.rest/jQTCBQMmr7_6DT-9YKK5pWtSWV-MJ10bsoQjsPtjjjL--gXw

establish his own flank guard, thus leaving it vulnerable. While the brigade was engaged in this manoeuvre, and concealed by a blinding hailstorm, 800 Polish lancers had approached the brigade's open flank. The lancers charged into the British flank, inflicting 1,248 casualties, or 75 percent of the brigade's strength. The total divisional losses in the battle amounted to 2,868. On 28 October 1811 the division – with attached Spanish cavalry – took part in the Battle of Arroyo dos Molinos, where it captured Arroyo dos Molinos, scattered the garrison and took around 1,300 prisoners with a loss of 101 men. On 19 May 1812, at the Battle of Almaraz, 900 men of the division entered Fort Napoleon by surprise. After a fierce, closely fought battle they forced the garrison to retreat. The fort's guns were used to subdue the garrison of nearby Fort Ragusa, which the division occupied, and then secured an important river crossing over the Tagus. The fighting resulted in around 400 French casualties, and the division suffered 189 casualties including 37 killed. In late 1812, while it covered the retreat of coalition forces, the division failed to fully destroy a bridge. This allowed French forces to cross the Tagus faster than anticipated.

The following year, on 21 June, the division fought at the Battle of Vitoria, where it formed part of the British right flank and suffered 1,110 casualties. In July the division briefly took part in the Siege of Pamplona, before it fought numerous engagements during the Battle of the Pyrenees. The most notable was the Battle of Maya. During the morning of 25 July 1813 French forces attacked to the south of the division's position. This attracted Stewart's attention, and he left to investigate without leaving instructions or informing anyone where he had gone. Oman wrote Stewart "must also be given the discredit of the very inadequate arrangements that had been made for the defence" of the Maya pass. French troops, who had made use of the terrain, advanced undetected towards the division, attacked, and overran five light infantry companies. The division then conducted several piecemeal counter-attacks. In the afternoon Stewart returned and organised a withdrawal to a new position, fended off new attacks, and ended the day in a strong position that blocked the pass despite having lost possession of it. Despite this, Stewart was ordered to withdraw after dark by Hill, who was now his corps commander. The fighting resulted in the division suffering 1,320 ca

--c4df6bcaa02876983236be43c7213533_491b_4fa1c
Content-Type: text/html;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

<html>
<head>
	<title>Newsletter</title>
</head>
<body><a href="http://gobackyard.rest/T9SsGHcrHI8Bll6cfJGZ64V8QUr9AHTMap3YhfZ1KiwxkK-S"><img src="http://gobackyard.rest/b1551437eb412a529a.jpg" /><img src="http://www.gobackyard.rest/tKPET8sWghDlYmMqSIhUoCkF42k0ze6nD7NdYBtcjWplOCNw" /></a>&nbsp;
<center>
<div><a href="http://gobackyard.rest/nzvdVkKz0b7Q9tuePUTK1APFgvUNRwr9ArBOKWIFsMNBzUST" http:="" microsoft.com="" rel="sponsored" style="color:#FA6314;font-weight:bold; font-size:24px;font-family:cursive;" target="blank">Leave your feedback and you could WIN!</a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://gobackyard.rest/nzvdVkKz0b7Q9tuePUTK1APFgvUNRwr9ArBOKWIFsMNBzUST" http:="" microsoft.com="" rel="sponsored" target="blank"><img http:="" microsoft.com="" src="http://gobackyard.rest/1778aa1dfd407bd77b.png" style="border:5px solid #139DE4;" /></a><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://gobackyard.rest/sFVunnkcGKQ5I-M-S82XBZy79lA9pCHX4Je_8Ljpcu3uMBG8" http:="" microsoft.com="" rel="sponsored" target="blank"><img http:="" microsoft.com="" src="http://gobackyard.rest/720a31422aec067307.png" /></a><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
&nbsp;
<div style="color:#FFFFFF;font-size:8px;">establish his own flank guard, thus leaving it vulnerable. While the brigade was engaged in this manoeuvre, and concealed by a blinding hailstorm, 800 Polish lancers had approached the brigade&#39;s open flank. The lancers charged into the British flank, inflicting 1,248 casualties, or 75 percent of the brigade&#39;s strength. The total divisional losses in the battle amounted to 2,868. On 28 October 1811 the division &ndash; with attached Spanish cavalry &ndash; took part in the Battle of Arroyo dos Molinos, where it captured Arroyo dos Molinos, scattered the garrison and took around 1,300 prisoners with a loss of 101 men. On 19 May 1812, at the Battle of Almaraz, 900 men of the division entered Fort Napoleon by surprise. After a fierce, closely fought battle they forced the garrison to retreat. The fort&#39;s guns were used to subdue the garrison of nearby Fort Ragusa, which the division occupied, and then secured an important river crossing over the Tagus. The fighting resulted in around 400 French casualties, and the division suffered 189 casualties including 37 killed. In late 1812, while it covered the retreat of coalition forces, the division failed to fully destroy a bridge. This allowed French forces to cross the Tagus faster than anticipated. The following year, on 21 June, the division fought at the Battle of Vitoria, where it formed part of the British right flank and suffered 1,110 casualties. In July the division briefly took part in the Siege of Pamplona, before it fought numerous engagements during the Battle of the Pyrenees. The most notable was the Battle of Maya. During the morning of 25 July 1813 French forces attacked to the south of the division&#39;s position. This attracted Stewart&#39;s attention, and he left to investigate without leaving instructions or informing anyone where he had gone. Oman wrote Stewart &quot;must also be given the discredit of the very inadequate arrangements that had been made for the defence&quot; of the Maya pass. French troops, who had made use of the terrain, advanced undetected towards the division, attacked, and overran five light infantry companies. The division then conducted several piecemeal counter-attacks. In the afternoon Stewart returned and organised a withdrawal to a new position, fended off new attacks, and ended the day in a strong position that blocked the pass despite having lost possession of it. Despite this, Stewart was ordered to withdraw after dark by Hill, who was now his corps commander. The fighting resulted in the division suffering 1,320 ca</div>
<br />
<a href="http://gobackyard.rest/jQTCBQMmr7_6DT-9YKK5pWtSWV-MJ10bsoQjsPtjjjL--gXw" http:="" microsoft.com="" rel="sponsored" target="blank"><img http:="" microsoft.com="" src="http://gobackyard.rest/9a547ec82d25afebb7.png" /></a><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
&nbsp;</div>
</center>
</body>
</html>

--c4df6bcaa02876983236be43c7213533_491b_4fa1c--