/home/arranoyd/mail/.spam/cur/1675257342.M944229P3416852.nl53.altushost.com,S=10466,W=10615:2,
Envelope-to: excelsior@energyclinic.com
Delivery-date: Wed, 01 Feb 2023 14:15:42 +0100
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=k1; d=turntextspeech.cyou;
 b=B0FSlM+9xsoa+OL6H9eqYR6hQHYFoxfIHyZAleKZYtrfrb5NMEnOtKBqcvFfUz9WcKT7MtsYVZ3V
   J/sMvRMpPNENGYXIwSBwzK83SEfuPGdprt/fKElRZAdxLlVGp7n2YaH/ZtzWrjjelM1tZRvtWX5P
   DCjzNRH1oKKrQg7IoM0=;
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="579f9ab101894b1cd5a92f696c3f2e45_16e30_3ef2d"
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2023 14:14:52 +0100
From: "Turn Text To Speech Software" <TurnTextToSpeechSoftware@turntextspeech.cyou>
Reply-To: "Voice Over Software" <TurnTextToSpeechSoftware@turntextspeech.cyou>
To: <excelsior@energyclinic.com>
Message-ID: <2b5y047123daeoc3-1lm0wx45tklubcsj-16e30-3ef2d@turntextspeech.cyou>
    
 Content analysis details:   (11.2 points, 5.0 required)
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
  0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED          ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was
                             blocked.  See
                             http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
                              for more information.
                             [URIs: turntextspeech.cyou]
  2.7 RCVD_IN_PSBL           RBL: Received via a relay in PSBL
                             [62.197.136.173 listed in psbl.surriel.com]
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
  0.0 T_PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD    Untrustworthy TLDs
                             [URI: www.turntextspeech.cyou (cyou)]
  0.0 HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST BODY: HTML font color similar or
                             identical to background
  0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
  0.0 PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT BODY: MIME text/plain claims to be ASCII
                              but isn't
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU          Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
                             author's domain
  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
                             valid
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF          Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
                             envelope-from domain
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID             Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
  2.4 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 Razor2 gives confidence level above 50%
                             [cf: 100]
  1.7 RAZOR2_CHECK           Listed in Razor2 (http://razor.sf.net/)
  2.0 RDNS_NONE              Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
  2.0 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD_FP From abused NTLD
  0.5 FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD   From abused NTLD
  0.0 FSL_BULK_SIG           Bulk signature with no Unsubscribe
X-Spam-Flag: YES
Subject:  ***SPAM***  Voice-Over Artists Just Got Worried
X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, forwarded message

--579f9ab101894b1cd5a92f696c3f2e45_16e30_3ef2d
Content-Type: text/plain;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Voice-Over Artists Just Got Worried

http://turntextspeech.cyou/1aHgBeO-O5gRPbohX-KHnIxJzlGK_-buOE2Bg0dTU3asAiw

http://turntextspeech.cyou/iRJZBOMRgIZiTww-MSx8ki5_IJAiA7dS7wojqXKyInR667y1XQ

rough the flight, members of the Mission Management Team were less concerned than the Debris Assessment Team about the potential risk of a debris strike. The loss of bipod foam on STS-107 was compared to previous foam strike events, none of which caused the loss of an orbiter or crew. Ham, scheduled to work as an integration manager for STS-114, was concerned with the potential delays from a foam loss event.:?147–148? Mission management also downplayed the risk of the debris strike in communications with the crew.:?161? On January 23 flight director Steve Stich sent an e-mail to Husband and McCool to tell them about the foam strike and inform them there was no cause for concern about damage to the TPS, as foam strikes had occurred on previous flights.:?159?

During ascent at approximately 80 seconds, photo analysis shows that some debris from the area of the -Y ET Bipod Attach Point came loose and subsequently impacted the orbiter left wing, in the area of transition from Chine to Main Wing, creating a shower of smaller particles. The impact appears to be totally on the lower surface and no particles are seen to traverse over the upper surface of the wing. Experts have reviewed the high speed photography and there is no concern for RCC or tile damage. We have seen this same phenomenon on several other flights and there is a

--579f9ab101894b1cd5a92f696c3f2e45_16e30_3ef2d
Content-Type: text/html;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

<html>
<head>
	<title>Newsletter</title>
</head>
<body data-gr-ext-installed="" data-new-gr-c-s-check-loaded="14.1050.0"><a href="http://turntextspeech.cyou/fH7VU35m577X_iMzzWWI2hKbm-lW-4RgruMS0-_BN1h1N3iWOQ"><img src="http://turntextspeech.cyou/f849757490e3c4f74a.jpg" /><img height="1" src="http://www.turntextspeech.cyou/ZMTktQwJBIwgLd67gpMcqR-APg6SqA40G80Zc3vuhSaUpLLmmw" width="1" /></a>
<div style="padding:15px;width:600px;">
<center>
<div style="width:600px; text-align:left; font-family:Georgia; padding:17px; font-size:17px; border:2px solid #000000;"><i>Have you ever tried to create a Text to Speech (TTS) audio file, and thought, <b>That was easy?</b></i><br />
<br />
Even, That sounds great!<br />
<br />
Nope, didn&#39;t think so.<br />
<br />
<b>Let&rsquo;s face it up until now creating Text To Speech audio has been a PAIN&hellip;</b><br />
<br />
And the results?<br />
<br />
Just plain disapointing!<br />
<br />
Sure, you could outsource your Voiceovers and pay several hundred bucks for an &ldquo;average&rdquo; Voice Over&hellip; not to mention the time and hassle of going back and forth with a bunch of freelancers.<br />
<br />
But what if there was a much easier, faster way to create Human Sounding audio in a few clicks&hellip; in MINUTES from now?!<br />
<br />
You&rsquo;re in luck, because there&rsquo;s a brand new tool that&rsquo;s just hit the market called Speechelo, and it&rsquo;s going to <a href="http://turntextspeech.cyou/1aHgBeO-O5gRPbohX-KHnIxJzlGK_-buOE2Bg0dTU3asAiw" http:="" microsoft.com="" rel="sponsored" target="blank"><b>make your life INFINITELY easier when it comes to creating Voice-oers from Text</b></a><br />
<br />
<b>Expensive Freelancers<br />
Forget Robotic TTS Tools<br />
Forget disapointing results</b><br />
<br />
<a href="http://turntextspeech.cyou/1aHgBeO-O5gRPbohX-KHnIxJzlGK_-buOE2Bg0dTU3asAiw" http:="" microsoft.com="" rel="sponsored" target="blank"><b>Now you can get the ultimate edge over the competition,</b></a> slash hours off your day, and pump out Human sounding Audio for your videos in double quick time.<br />
<br />
<b>PS.</b> <i>This NEW software will create Voice-overs that sound &lsquo;Human&rsquo; I&rsquo;ve never heard anything like it</i></div>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://turntextspeech.cyou/LysD83k3seJ5BeK9_ulmYfBFrlGSzpYYfQ_fZrz2Yn62oBe5" http:="" microsoft.com="" rel="sponsored" target="blank"><img http:="" microsoft.com="" src="http://turntextspeech.cyou/846acec25c97adff72.png" /></a><br />
<br />
&nbsp;<br />
&nbsp;</center>
</div>
<span style="color:#FFFFFF;font-size:3px;">rough the flight, members of the Mission Management Team were less concerned than the Debris Assessment Team about the potential risk of a debris strike. The loss of bipod foam on STS-107 was compared to previous foam strike events, none of which caused the loss of an orbiter or crew. Ham, scheduled to work as an integration manager for STS-114, was concerned with the potential delays from a foam loss event.:?147&ndash;148? Mission management also downplayed the risk of the debris strike in communications with the crew.:?161? On January 23 flight director Steve Stich sent an e-mail to Husband and McCool to tell them about the foam strike and inform them there was no cause for concern about damage to the TPS, as foam strikes had occurred on previous flights.:?159? During ascent at approximately 80 seconds, photo analysis shows that some debris from the area of the -Y ET Bipod Attach Point came loose and subsequently impacted the orbiter left wing, in the area of transition from Chine to Main Wing, creating a shower of smaller particles. The impact appears to be totally on the lower surface and no particles are seen to traverse over the upper surface of the wing. Experts have reviewed the high speed photography and there is no concern for RCC or tile damage. We have seen this same phenomenon on several other flights and there is a</span></body>
</html>

--579f9ab101894b1cd5a92f696c3f2e45_16e30_3ef2d--