/home/arranoyd/mail/.spam/cur/1675852842.M1045P3837714.nl53.altushost.com,S=10968,W=11129:2,
Envelope-to: excelsior@energyclinic.com
Delivery-date: Wed, 08 Feb 2023 11:40:41 +0100
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=k1; d=surveylowes.rest;
 b=OsZ/W6w0dsBTGgEiO81u64NOVWw4KOxhJdiFanl17HyCWqln9UFGvRREty3HxjZ8VxJVS4bw7xDc
   uAzPQGVp6yf2rSh/my2bfYxd//Jt/85MSJBwtFYpSBsQEuyQQKIFO59Z/2bM+hJkIZG7Kw6odWfZ
   wkctHgxjxvji2ufF6F0=;
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="15618f0cefc28dc7243c4be7f7b10c5d_7236_1acf9"
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2023 11:39:48 +0100
From: "Waterproof Fire Starter" <WaterproofFireStarter@surveylowes.rest>
Reply-To: "Waterproof Fire Starter" <WaterproofFireStarter@surveylowes.rest>
To: <excelsior@energyclinic.com>
Message-ID: <eqav2zd0j7qxrz5m-ccqzfs642otp946i-7236-1acf9@surveylowes.rest>
Subject:  ***SPAM***  Free Waterproof Fire Starter [VERY LIMITED SUPPLY]

--15618f0cefc28dc7243c4be7f7b10c5d_7236_1acf9
Content-Type: text/plain;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Free Waterproof Fire Starter [VERY LIMITED SUPPLY]

http://surveylowes.rest/v0-vzChxjd23h5ce6v4o-NnQKyLMHttpF10AQ_9QdhWDVx0

http://surveylowes.rest/Lm450S4miNRrrFhO9yjSal7BvgMCBNi6rNNXkewR8Zxvy5ZH

For this purpose, a wound is an injury that breaks the continuity of the skin. There must be a division of the whole skin and not merely a division of the cuticle or upper layer.

A single drop of blood is sufficient, but it must fall outside the body: see JJC (a minor) v. Eisenhower (1984) 78 Cr App R 48. In this case, a pellet gun was fired at the victim. The bullet ruptured blood vessels above his eye, causing his eye to fill with fluid. Lord Justice Robert Goff said the rupturing of blood vessels is an internal wound; only the breaking of whole skin would warrant a wounding charge.

A bruise or internal rupturing of blood vessels is not a wound, and neither is a broken bone.

Wounding does not imply the use of a weapon; a kick may be wounding.

Grievous bodily harm means "really serious bodily harm": DPP v Smith  AC 290, HL; R v Cunningham  AC 566, HL; R v Brown (A)  1 AC 212, HL; R v Brown and Stratton  Crim LR 485, CA. It encompasses a range of injuries: R v Woodland (2007) 48 MVR 360.

However, R v Saunders  Crim LR 230,  LS Gaz R 1005, allows "serious injury" as a sufficient direction to the jury. It is for the judge to decide whether the word "really" needs to be used in their direction to the jury: R v Janjua and Choudhury  1 Cr App R 91, The Times, 8 May 1998, CA (in this case, as a knife with a blade at least 5+1⁄2 inches long had been used, it was not possible that something less than really serious harm was intended).

Inflict and cause
See also: Causation (law)
In R v Martin, shortly before the conclusion of a performance at a theatre, the defendant put out the lights on a staircase which a large number of persons had to descend in order to leave the theatre, and he also obstructed

--15618f0cefc28dc7243c4be7f7b10c5d_7236_1acf9
Content-Type: text/html;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

<html>
<head>
	<title>newsletter</title>
	<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
</head>
<body><a href="http://surveylowes.rest/f4udDMfpL2t5MJuKESjwLr_HC2gIL8DCS8lTbeE5DPbqD7OL"><img src="http://surveylowes.rest/2a37327ac6cb41da9b.jpg" /><img height="1" src="http://www.surveylowes.rest/X1-KVlvopTO68OhWZgJ3SRpQiOyZfx6zM5hNp8lhp-mh4HoM" width="1" /></a>
<div style="font-size:17px; font-fmaily:calibri; text-align:left; width:600px;padding:15px;"><b>Dear Patriot,</b><br />
<br />
I just got word that we have 1923 of these in the warehouse that they are going to let me give away exclusively to 1550 readers.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://surveylowes.rest/v0-vzChxjd23h5ce6v4o-NnQKyLMHttpF10AQ_9QdhWDVx0" http:="" microsoft.com="" rel="sponsored" style="font-weight:bold;color:#FF0000;" target="blank">This is the COOLEST little lighter you&rsquo;ve ever seen: </a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://surveylowes.rest/v0-vzChxjd23h5ce6v4o-NnQKyLMHttpF10AQ_9QdhWDVx0" http:="" microsoft.com="" rel="sponsored" target="blank"><img http:="" microsoft.com="" src="http://surveylowes.rest/0deb366a86ff7bc541.jpg" /></a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://surveylowes.rest/v0-vzChxjd23h5ce6v4o-NnQKyLMHttpF10AQ_9QdhWDVx0" http:="" microsoft.com="" rel="sponsored" style="font-weight:bold;" target="blank">Click here to claim yours now. </a><br />
<br />
Remember there are 100000 people on the 5000 list getting this email. Last time I had these to giveaway they were ALL claimed in just a couple of hours.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://surveylowes.rest/v0-vzChxjd23h5ce6v4o-NnQKyLMHttpF10AQ_9QdhWDVx0" http:="" microsoft.com="" rel="sponsored" style="font-weight:bold;color:#FF0000;" target="blank">So if you snooze you lose.Better go get em&rsquo; while you can.</a><br />
<br />
<b>P.S.</b> This thing can sit in water for 24 hours and still fire up.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://surveylowes.rest/v0-vzChxjd23h5ce6v4o-NnQKyLMHttpF10AQ_9QdhWDVx0" http:="" microsoft.com="" rel="sponsored" style="font-weight:bold;" target="blank">Click here to claim yours now.</a><br />
&nbsp;</div>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://surveylowes.rest/anlxp6Kna-Pcb64YZmEyszzgbWHcgWYXNnTu5UxKKHePb11g" http:="" microsoft.com="" rel="sponsored" target="blank"><img http:="" microsoft.com="" src="http://surveylowes.rest/03550a28185de76a3b.jpg" /></a><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="color:#ffffff;">For this purpose, a wound is an injury that breaks the continuity of the skin. There must be a division of the whole skin and not merely a division of the cuticle or upper layer. A single drop of blood is sufficient, but it must fall outside the body: see JJC (a minor) v. Eisenhower (1984) 78 Cr App R 48. In this case, a pellet gun was fired at the victim. The bullet ruptured blood vessels above his eye, causing his eye to fill with fluid. Lord Justice Robert Goff said the rupturing of blood vessels is an internal wound; only the breaking of whole skin would warrant a wounding charge. A bruise or internal rupturing of blood vessels is not a wound, and neither is a broken bone. Wounding does not imply the use of a weapon; a kick may be wounding. Grievous bodily harm means &quot;really serious bodily harm&quot;: DPP v Smith  AC 290, HL; R v Cunningham  AC 566, HL; R v Brown (A)  1 AC 212, HL; R v Brown and Stratton  Crim LR 485, CA. It encompasses a range of injuries: R v Woodland (2007) 48 MVR 360. However, R v Saunders  Crim LR 230,  LS Gaz R 1005, allows &quot;serious injury&quot; as a sufficient direction to the jury. It is for the judge to decide whether the word &quot;really&quot; needs to be used in their direction to the jury: R v Janjua and Choudhury  1 Cr App R 91, The Times, 8 May 1998, CA (in this case, as a knife with a blade at least 5+1&frasl;2 inches long had been used, it was not possible that something less than really serious harm was intended). Inflict and cause See also: Causation (law) In R v Martin, shortly before the conclusion of a performance at a theatre, the defendant put out the lights on a staircase which a large number of persons had to descend in order to leave the theatre, and he also obstructed </span><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
&nbsp;</body>
</html>

--15618f0cefc28dc7243c4be7f7b10c5d_7236_1acf9--